Riggs v. Sterling
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Chambers, J.) Proceedings to recover possession of land. Complainant .appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGeaves, C. J.
In 1874 tbe defendant William bought the premises in the record, and from thence hitherto he and his wife, the defendant Sallie, have continued to occupy them as their home and residence. The premises are less than 40 acres and lie in the country, and not within any recorded town plat, or city or village. They were worth ;$2000. In January, 1880, the plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant William, and in February levied •on this property. The defendants had notice of the levy, but paid no attention to it, and the plaintiff made ho attempt to have an appraisal. In April the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bennett v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Vos v. DykemaMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Roberts v. Highway CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Campau v. ButtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Foss v. Van DrieleMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Riggs v. SterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Gage v. SanbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Mulder v. CorlettMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Northern Michigan Building & Loan Ass'n v. ForsMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Balch v. RadfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.