Legal Opinion

Holt v. City of San Antonio

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 16, 1977No. 15713PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARROW, Chief Justice.

Nine owners of massage parlors and one masseuse, who are appellants herein, brought this suit against The City of San Antonio seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the City from enforcing an ordinance regulating the massage business. 1 Appellants alleged that many sections of the ordinance were unconstitutional. The trial court entered a judgment after a non-jury trial which granted appellants injunc-tive relief in part and permanently enjoined City from enforcing nine enumerated sections of the ordinance, but denied all other relief.

Both parties complain of this…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. Austin City Cemetery Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. State v. Cook United, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Ex Parte SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Glover v. McMurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Kisley v. City of Falls ChurchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. James O. Pollard, Etc. v. Lila Cockrell, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Stansberry v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. University Interscholastic League v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Spinuzzi v. Town of CorinthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Hopper v. Safeguard Business Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API