Legal Opinion

United States Trust Co. v. Wenzell

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hammer, J,

Motion is made by defendant Ambrose Day for judgment determining bis ultimate rights as between him and the codefendants under section 264 of the Civil Practice Act, and under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice. This motion is directed to plaintiff and defendants Thompson and Wenzell individually.

Plaintiff’s action here is for an accounting. Plaintiff was duly appointed trustee under a deed of trust by Zillah Robinson, dated *1000March 27,1894. The trust indenture required the trustee to collect the interest, income and dividends so delivered to it and to pay over the same to Zillah…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cutting v. . CuttingNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Farmers' Loan Trust Co. v. . MortimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Hirsch v. BuckiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  4. In re the Estate of PalmerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. HoweNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  2. United States Trust Co. v. WenzellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API