Bally Total Fitness Holding Corp. v. Faber
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PREGERSON, District Judge.
Andrew S. Faber’s motion for summary judgment came before the Court for oral argument on November 23, 1998. After reviewing and considering the materials submitted by the parties and hearing oral argument, the Court GRANTS Faber’s motion for summary judgment.
BACKGROUND
Bally Total Fitness Holding Corp. (“Bally”) brings this action for trademark infringement, unfair competition, and dilution against Andrew S. Faber (“Faber”) in connection with Bally’s federally registered trademarks and service marks in the terms…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Panavision International, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership v. Dennis Toeppen Network Solutions, Inc., a District of Columbia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- The International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. Winship Green Nursing CenterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Spider Webs Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- OBH, Inc. v. Spotlight Magazine, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2000
- Northland Ins. Companies v. BlaylockDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
- Bihari v. GrossDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.