Legal Opinion
Bihari v. Gross
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 25, 2000No. 00 Civ. 1664(SAS)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Marianne Bihari and Bihari Interiors, Inc. (collectively “Bihari”) move to preliminarily enjoin defendants Craig Gross and Yolanda Truglio (collectively “Gross”) from using the names “Bihari” or “Bihari Interiors” in the domain names or metatags of any of their websites (“the Gross websites”), claiming that such use violates the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (“ACPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(1), and infringes on Bihari’s common-law service mark in violation of § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(A). Additionally,…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- New York Times Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Savin Corporation v. The Savin Group, Savin Engineers, P.C., Savin Consultants, Inc. D/B/A Savin Engineers, P.C., and Jmoa Engineering, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. whenu.com, Inc. And Vision Direct, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Government Employees Insurance v. Google, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. WhenU. Com, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- 800-JR Cigar, Inc. v. GoTo. Com, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.