Legal Opinion

Pace v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided August 4, 2010No. 09-09-00182-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID GAULTNEY, Justice.

Phillip David Pace, Jr. pled guilty to possession of marijuana. The trial court adjudicated his guilt, sentenced him to 180 days in jail, suspended the imposition of the sentence, and placed him on community supervision for one year. Pace appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Pace contends the consent given by his mother to enter the residence was invalid; the officer exceeded the scope of any consent given; Pace did not consent to entry into his bedroom; and the officer did not have probable cause to search Pace’s bedroom. The record…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Erik Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
  2. Miko Deyond Parks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2015
  3. Ruthen James Weems v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API