Legal Opinion

Draper v. Farris

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Laclede Circuit' Court. — Hon. C. C. Bland, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

— This is an action of replevin, instituted before a justice of the peace, to recover a fruit evaporator. The plaintiff in his affidavit stated that the value of the article was $145. The property *418was not delivered to the plaintiff, because (as appeared upon the trial) it could not be found. There was judgment for the defendant before the justice. The plaintiff took an appeal, but did not state in his affidavit whether the appeal was taken from the merits or from an order or judgment taxing costs, as required by section 6330 of the Revised Statutes of 1889. No advantage of this defeat was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gray v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  2. Snider v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  3. Welsh v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Broadwater v. DarneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1846
  5. Wright v. RichmondMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reeves v. NobleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Drake v. GorrellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Rosentreter v. BradyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Townsend v. HomanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Marion Distilling Co. v. EllisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API