Bell v. Viavi Co.

Pennewill, C. J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

In the above stated cases the court, sitting in Banc, found that the defendant was doing business in this state in such manner as to make it amenable to the laws of this state. The defendant now moves that the case be reopened, so that alleged after-discovered evidence may be introduced which would show that the defendant was not doing business in this state and that the opinion of the court, was, therefore, erroneous.

*177The evidence sought to be introduced is an agreement dated February 20, 1900, between the Viavi Company, a co-partnership…