Legal Opinion

State v. Hough

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 13, 1997No. 24548PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLER, Justice:

We granted a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ opinion in State v. Hough, 319 S.C. 104, 459 S.E.2d 863 (Ct.App.1995). We affirm in result.

FACTS

Hough and a co-defendant, James Pierce Jr., were indicted for third degree burglary and grand larceny. The charges stemmed from the burglary of a Chesterfield County warehouse in which two power saws and two flashlights were stolen. The State’s theory of the case was that Pierce and Hough had a drug problem and had committed the burglary to obtain money to purchase crack cocaine.

In his opening statement, the solicitor…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Larry W. MastersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
  2. State v. LyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  3. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. State v. CopelandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. State v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  5. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API