State v. Hough
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WALLER, Justice:
We granted a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ opinion in State v. Hough, 319 S.C. 104, 459 S.E.2d 863 (Ct.App.1995). We affirm in result.
FACTS
Hough and a co-defendant, James Pierce Jr., were indicted for third degree burglary and grand larceny. The charges stemmed from the burglary of a Chesterfield County warehouse in which two power saws and two flashlights were stolen. The State’s theory of the case was that Pierce and Hough had a drug problem and had committed the burglary to obtain money to purchase crack cocaine.
In his opening statement, the solicitor…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Larry W. MastersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- State v. LyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- State v. CopelandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- State v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.