Legal Opinion
Day v. Day
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 12, 1993No. 92-8788Published
1Opinion of the Court
510 U.S. 1 (1993)
DAY
v.
DAY
No. 92-8788.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided October 12, 1993.[*]
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
2Per curiam
Pro se petitioner Roy A. Day requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis under Rule 39 of this Court. We deny this request pursuant to Rule 39.8. Day is allowed until November 2, 1993, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38 and to submit his petitions in compliance with this Court's Rule 33. We also direct the Clerk not to accept any further petitions for certiorari from Day in noncriminal matters unless he pays the docketing fee…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Martin v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Theodis Brown v. Herald Co., Inc., EtcSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In Re SindramSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Day v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.