Legal Opinion
Hospice of New Mexico, LLC v. Sebelius
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided March 5, 2010No. CIV 09-00145 RB-LFGPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBERT C. BRACK, District Judge.
THIS MATTER came before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. (Does. 13 & 15.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that 42 C.F.R. § 418.309(b)(1) is invalid and should be set aside, Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgement/Stay (Doc. 15) is GRANTED, and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 13) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The case involves the validity of federal regulation 42 C.F.R. § 418.309(b)(1), promulgated by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Los Angeles Haven Hospice, Inc. v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- AFFINITY HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Affinity Healthcare Services, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Russell-Murray Hospice, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- AT & T Mobility Services, LLC v. Village of CorralesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.