AT & T Mobility Services, LLC v. Village of Corrales
District Court, D. New Mexico
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MARTHA VÁZQUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff AT & T Mobility Services, LLC’s (“AT & T”) and the Village of Cor-rales’s (the “Village” or “Corrales”) cross-motions for summary judgment [Docs. 29, 32]. The Court, having considered the motions, briefs, relevant law, and being otherwise fully informed, finds that AT & T’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 29] is well-taken therefore will be GRANTED and that the Village’s Motion [Doc. 32] is not well-taken and therefore will be DENIED.
BACKGROUND
As an initial matter, the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. AbramsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Varnell v. Dora Consolidated School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- National Tower, LLC v. Plainville Zoning Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Apt Pittsburgh Limited Partnership v. Penn Township Butler County Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Berges v. Standard InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Davidson Oil Company v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2022
- Eco-Site II, LLC v. The Town of WilmingtonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- Eco-Site LLC v. County of Pueblo, ColoradoDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020
- Hare v. BaurDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
- NMSURF, Inc. v. State of New Mexico Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.