Legal Opinion

COLLINS & AIKMAN CORPORATION v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1992No. 9126SC451PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENE, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from an order filed 18 March 1991, denying plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment and granting the partial summary judgment motion of defendant The Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company (Hartford).

Plaintiff Collins & Aikman Corporation (C&A) is a Delaware corporation with offices in New York and Charlotte which manufactures and distributes textile products. C&A is licensed to do business in eight states, including North Carolina. C&A’s transportation division is located in Albemarle, North Carolina, and ninety-seven of C&A’s 102 trucks are registered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mazza v. Medical Mut. Ins. Co. of NCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. HoyleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. South Carolina Insurance v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. Continental InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. New South Insurance v. KiddCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Boyd v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Am. Realty Advisors v. Lexington Ins. Co.North Carolina Business Court · 2019
  5. Progressive Southeastern Insurance Company v. RodriguezDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API