Legal Opinion

State v. . Ward

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 25, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

The record and case on appeal, exclusive of exhibits, consumes 135 pages and discloses 325 exceptions. Many of these exceptions, however, are not brought forward in the brief. Others are abandoned under the rules of practice in this Court. Rule 28. We will discuss only those which are sufficiently presented for our consideration.

The defendant moved to quash each bill of indictment. The motions filed, however, assign no grounds therefor. No defect is alleged, no deficiency is designated.

In his brief here, he attacks # 4340 for that there is no such crime as aiding and abetting embezzlement.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. State v. Van PeltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. ArenzSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. AgnewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. AverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API