Legal Opinion
United States v. Birrell
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 19, 1967No. 61 Cr. 692PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HERLANDS, District Judge:
Defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars (Fed.R.Crim.P. 7(f)) seeks to compel the Government to supply him with thirty-six items of information identified in the motion papers as particulars “(a)” to “(jj)”.
The motion, originally filed September 4, 1964 and subsequently adjourned and thereafter struck from the motion calendar, was revived and brought on for hearing by a written notice filed October 28, 1966. This procedure was consented to by the Government and approved by the Court, at a pretrial conference held on October 17,1966.
On January 10, 1967, both…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Elliott Kahaner, Antonio Corallo and James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Mayor of Baltimore City v. DawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. KahanerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. AddonizioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- United States v. AddonizioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- United States v. BirrellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- United States v. BoffaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- United States v. TannerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.