Legal Opinion

Brummett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 25, 1928No. A-6237PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.

The plaintiff in error, Ed Brum-mett, hereinafter styled defendant, was by information charged with the crime, viz.:

“One Ed Brummett, then and there being, did then and there willfully and unlawfully manufacture and ferment one barrel of corn mash, with the unlawful intent of him, the said Ed Brummett, to then and there manufacture spirituous liquor, to wit, whisky, by cooking, boiling and distilling said whisky from said fermented mash.”

A trial was had, and defendant was found guilty as charged in the information, but the jury failed to agree upon the punishment and wrote into the verdict,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pickrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Baldwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Byars v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Gabler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Selfridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Kizer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Kimbrough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API