Legal Opinion

State v. Thang

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 17, 1933No. 29,016PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIBELL, Justice.

The defendant was convicted in Renville county of grand larceny in the first degree and appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial. The indictment ivas under G. S. 1923 (2 Mason, 1927) § 10369. It alleges that on September 1, 1930, the defendant misappropriated $1,000 before that time received by him as guardian of one Brede O. Strand, an incompetent person.

As far back as 1911 Brede O. Strand, an incompetent, came under guardianship in the probate court of Renville county. In 1923 one W. C. Hanson became his guardian in succession to another. At this time he and…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Khalifa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. John v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. DanielskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. PierceSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  5. State v. FlattCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API