Legal Opinion
Langan v. Zba, Unpublished Decision (8-31-2005)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 31, 2005No. 05CA008640UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
{¶ 1} Appellants, John Langan, et. al., appeal the judgment of the Lorain County Court of Common Pleas affirming a variance request granted by the Avon Lake Board of Zoning Appeals. We affirm the decision of the trial court.
{¶ 2} Kopf Construction Co. (Applicant) applied to the Avon Lake Board of Zoning Appeals requesting a zoning variance reducing the minimum width of the side yard set backs from 35 feet to 10 feet on Lots 69 and 78 in the Legacy Pointe PUD (planned unit development) Subdivision No. 3. Applicant submitted the application for the variance on behalf…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kisil v. City of SanduskyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Henley v. City of Youngstown Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Smith v. Granville Township Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Duncan v. Village of MiddlefieldOhio Supreme Court · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- County of Summit v. Stoll, 23465 (6-13-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Dickinson v. Bath Township, 23322 (3-28-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007