Legal Opinion

United States v. Placido Cabral, Etc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 12, 2001No. 00-1068PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARCÍ A-GRE GORY, District Judge.

Plácido Cabral was convicted, following a jury trial, for attempting to re-enter the United States after having been previously arrested and deported, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. On appeal, Cabral argues that the district court erred in denying his motion for acquittal because he did not attempt to re-enter the United States, and because he lacked a specific intent to do so, as the statute allegedly requires. Cabral also contends that the district court erred by failing to instruct the jury on specific intent as an element of the offense. We affirm.

BACKGRO…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Scarfo v. Cabletron Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. OlbresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Jose Luis Ayala, AKA Jose Ayala-Giron AKA Jose Luis Ayalay AKA Oscar Jiron AKA Jose Linares AKA Luis EsquivelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Rolf Wilhelm Otto AntonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Roberto Antonio MarteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. GarcíaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Florentino-RosarioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  5. United States v. Pedro Hernandez-QuintaniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API