Legal Opinion
State v. Walker
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 26, 1929No. 3298PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BICKLEY, C. J.
Appellants were jointly convicted of violating Code 1915, § 549, which requires any person killing a bovine animal to preserve the hide unchanged and unmutilated for a period of 30 days, for inspection.
It is contended as to each appellant that there was insufficient evidence to warrant submission to the jury. From a careful reading of the record, we conclude that there was substantial evidence of the guilt of both. It would serve no useful purpose to recount it here.
It is contended that the section is in violation of various guaranties of the Bill of Rights…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Dunham v. OttingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bradbury & Stamm Construction Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Eachus v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- State v. KlantchnekNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. MorenoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Bradbury & Stamm Construction Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.