Legal Opinion

People v. Sarasti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 17, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

At the end of the second day of testimony during the trial of Indictment No. 4321/92, the Trial Judge asked a court officer to send the jury home, and to "[a]dvise [the jurors] to adhere to the rules of conduct they were previously instructed on, and to be prepared for possible sequestration”. There is no indication in the record that the court officer did anything more than he was asked to do. Although it would have been better practice for the Trial Judge to issue those instructions himself (see, e.g., People v Bonaparte, 78 NY2d 26, 32; People v Smith, 181 AD2d 844, 845), on the present…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BonaparteNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. NaceyNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CrespoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. People v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API