Legal Opinion

People v. Nacey

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 17, 1991PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, and the judgment of Supreme Court, Queens County, reinstated.

We recently held that it is within the scope of a court officer’s "administerial duties” (CPL 310.10) to tell deliberating jurors, at the court’s direction, that they should stop deliberating because they were going to be taken to dinner and sequestered for the evening (People v Bonaparte, 78 NY2d 26). It was likewise within the administerial duties of the court officer in this case — decided by the Appellate Division before our Bonaparte decision…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. BonaparteNew York Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. LebronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. People v. BuxtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. People v. BelgraveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. People v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API