Legal Opinion
People v. Woodham
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 5, 1990PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The complainant testified that he was attacked by the defendant and two other men who were armed with knives and a gun. The defendant grabbed the complainant by the neck, put him against a wall, and punched him all over. The assailants then took a ring, a watch, a calculator, and about $400 in cash from the complainant.
Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. . GaimariNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- People v. GarafoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- People v. MayoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. FoleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. MarcusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. BlumeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. VitaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re Noe H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. Cava-BurgosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.