Qualls v. Sayles
Court of Appeals of Texas
Eebob from Walker. Tried below before Hon. R. E. Haxxay.
1Opinion of the Court
GARRETT, Chief Justice.
This suit was brought by the plaintiff in error, G. Qualls, against the defendants in error to recover of them the damages given by statute for a breach of the bond of the defendant, C. W. Sayles, as a liquor dealer, in selling beer to plaintiff’s minor son and permitting said minor to enter and remain in his place of business. The trial in the court below was by jury and resulted in a judgment for the defendants.
It was shown by the evidence that Jesse Qualls, the minor son of the plaintiff, about the 9th day of January, 1897, entered the saloon of the defendant Sayles,…
2Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1908
- Summers v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Rollins v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Quanah, A. & P. Ry. Co. v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Haynes v. HaberzettleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912