Campbell v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON DANA CAMPBELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil No. 5:18-cv-194-JMH ) v. ) ) HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT ) MEMORANDUM OPIONION COMPANY, d/b/a THE HARTFORD, ) AND ORDER ) Defendant. ) ** ** ** ** ** Plaintiff Dana Campbell brings this action pursuant to the Employment Retirement Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), against Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, doing business as The Hartford (“Hartford”). Mrs. Campbell seeks to recover supplemental benefits under her spouse Gary…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Zedner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Connie M. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.