Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided June 8, 2021No. 5:18-cv-00194Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON DANA CAMPBELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil No. 5:18-cv-194-JMH ) v. ) ) HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT ) MEMORANDUM OPIONION COMPANY, d/b/a THE HARTFORD, ) AND ORDER ) Defendant. ) ** ** ** ** ** Plaintiff Dana Campbell brings this action pursuant to the Employment Retirement Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), against Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, doing business as The Hartford (“Hartford”). Mrs. Campbell seeks to recover supplemental benefits under her spouse Gary…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Zedner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Connie M. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API