Legal Opinion

DoorDash, Inc. v. City Of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 13, 2024No. 1:21-cv-07695Unknown

1Opinion

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED December 12, 2024 DATE FILED: _ 12/13/2024 The Honorable Analisa Torres United States District Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: = DoorDash, Inc. v. City of New York, No. 21-cv-7695-AT-SLC; Portier, LLC v. City of New York, 21-cv-10347-AT-SLC; Grubhub Inc. v. City of New York, 21-cv-10602-AT-SLC Dear Judge Torres: Plaintiffs DoorDash, Inc., Portier, LLC, and Grubhub Inc. respectfully request an extension of time to move for attorneys’ fees and costs under 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b). Plaintiffs’ deadline to move for attorneys’…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dietz v. BouldinSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Knoeffler v. Town of MamakatingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  3. American Freedom Defense Initiative v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API