Legal Opinion
Baxter House, Inc. v. Rosen
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHenry J. Latham, J.
Defendants move to dismiss plaintiffs’ four cause's of action.
*78Plaintiffs, Baxter House, Inc., and Vanderbilt Towers, Inc., creditors of decedent George Eosen (hereinafter referred to as decedent), seek in this action to recover from defendants, Hattie Eosen, Irene Eosen and Boslyn Doris Eosen, the wife and daughters of decedent, a share of the proceeds of 11 insurance policies on decedent’s life in which defendant's were designated beneficiaries. These policies were issued to the decedent between December 18, 1947 and July 21, 1961.
Plaintiffs allege, in substance, that between April 30, 1963…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Holmes v. . GilmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Ruth Halle Rowen, Ethel F. Halle, and Edward Halle v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Chatham Phenix National Bank v. CrosneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Purvin v. GreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Lois Adlman, Bankrupt. Bank of Pennsylvania v. Lois AdlmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Baxter House, Inc. v. RosenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- In Re Lois Adlman, Bankrupt. Bank of Pennsylvania v. Lois AdlmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976