Legal Opinion

Yaccino v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 5, 2004No. 2-02-1247, 2-02-1248 cons. RelPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Callum

Plaintiff, Michael Yaccino, sought a declaratory judgment (735 ILCS 5/2 — 701 (West 2002)) specifying whether defendant and cross-plaintiff-appellant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s (State Farm’s) and defendant and cross-defendant-appellee, Intergovernmental Risk Management Agency’s (IRMA’s) uninsured motorist coverages were primary or excess. State Farm filed a cross-claim against IRMA, seeking a declaration that IRMA’s uninsured motorist coverage was primary and that State Farm’s was excess. Upon cross-motions for summary judgment (735 ILCS 5/2 — 1005 (West 2002)) on State…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Steinbrecher v. SteinbrecherIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Auton v. Logan Landfill, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Antiporek v. Village of HillsideIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Richardson v. Rock Island County Officers Electoral BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pritza v. Village of LansingAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  2. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co. v. Pace Suburban Bus ServiceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  3. Sharp v. The Board of Trustees of the State Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  4. State Farm v. Du Page CountyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  5. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. v. Du Page CountyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API