Hayutin v. Rudnick
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting defendant’s motion for change of the place of trial from the county of Los Angeles to the county of Kern.
The action was filed in the county of Los Angeles. Defendant was sued individually and as executor of the estate of Libbie Rudnick, his deceased wife. He was served in both capacities in the county of Kern. The complaint, containing six causes of action, is grounded on an oral contract of “joint venture or partnership” alleged to have been made between plaintiffs and defendant Rudnick and his deceased wife, whereby plaintiffs, in return…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baratti v. BarattiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Bealmear v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Sheeley v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Abbey v. SchaeferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Bailey v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Bonelli v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Ward Manufacturing Co. v. MileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Murray v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.