Legal Opinion

Mathis v. Benavides

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 16, 2016No. 04-15-00555-CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion on Appellant’s Motion to Stop Imminent Release of Supersedeas Deposit

Opinion by:

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Shirley Hale Mathis, as permanent guardian of the estate of Carlos Y. Bena-vides Jr., has filed an “emergency motion to stop imminent release of supersedeas deposit per Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 24.4.” The basis for Mathis’s motion *296is that the trial court erred under Rule 24 by ordering the district clerk to deliver Mathis’s supersedeas deposit to appellee Leticia Benavides, the wife of Carlos Y. Benavides. Mathis requested that we review the trial court’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ammex Warehouse Company v. ArcherTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Ex Parte HallTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. in Re Longview Energy Company and in Re Huff Energy Fund, L.P., and Riley-Huff Energy Group, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Clay v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Ex Parte KollenbornTexas Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frank Ahlgren III and the Copernican, LLC v. Frank Ahlgren Jr. and Elise Leake, as Co-Trustees of the Ahlgren Management Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API