Mathis v. Benavides
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion on Appellant’s Motion to Stop Imminent Release of Supersedeas Deposit
Opinion by:
Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Shirley Hale Mathis, as permanent guardian of the estate of Carlos Y. Bena-vides Jr., has filed an “emergency motion to stop imminent release of supersedeas deposit per Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 24.4.” The basis for Mathis’s motion *296is that the trial court erred under Rule 24 by ordering the district clerk to deliver Mathis’s supersedeas deposit to appellee Leticia Benavides, the wife of Carlos Y. Benavides. Mathis requested that we review the trial court’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ammex Warehouse Company v. ArcherTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Ex Parte HallTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- in Re Longview Energy Company and in Re Huff Energy Fund, L.P., and Riley-Huff Energy Group, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Clay v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Ex Parte KollenbornTexas Supreme Court · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.