Legal Opinion

Texas Bank & Trust Co. v. Austin

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1926No. 4357PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greenwood

The sole question presented by the pleadings in this suit for mandamus is whether a bank and trust company, incorporated under the laws of Texas, is entitled to change its system of doing business and its mode of guaranteeing deposits from the guaranty system to the bond security system, on tendering to the Banking Commissioner a duly authorized application for such change and bonds of the United States, approved by the county judge of the county of the company’s domicile and by the Banking Commissioner, in an amount equal to the amount of its capital stock — when it is made to appear that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Montclair v. RamsdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MahaffeyTexas Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. L & M-Surco Manufacturing, Inc. v. Winn Tile Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Providence Hospital v. TrulyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. San Antonio Conservation Society, Inc. v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Travenol Laboratories, Inc. v. Bandy Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Harrison v. Nueces Royalty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API