Legal Opinion
Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Anaconda American Brass Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 30, 1967No. 41734PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
FULLAM, District Judge.
These actions were filed as class actions, brought on behalf of the named plaintiffs and all other similar entities who suffered damages as a result of an alleged conspiracy in violation of the antitrust laws. Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(c) (1) directs that “as soon as practicable after the commencement of an action brought as a class action, the court shall determine by order whether it is to be so maintained * * *.” Counsel have requested leave to file affidavits, counter-affidavits and briefs on this issue, and have indicated that they wish oral argument and possibly…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- The Flintkote Company, a Corporation v. Elmer Lysfjord and Walter R. Waldron, Doing Business as Aabeta Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Broadway & Ninety-Sixth Street Realty Corp. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
3Cited by85 opinions
- Alexander Kahan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lewis RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Dolgow v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Elsie Simer v. Richard J. Rios, Acting Director of Community Services Administration Community Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Anaconda American Brass Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Pauline Danner v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.