Legal Opinion

Ellibee v. Simmons

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 5, 2004No. 91,050PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

Nathaniel E. Ellibee appeals the district court’s summary dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Ellibee argues that the mandatory savings policy found in the Kansas penal system’s Internal Management Policy and Procedure (IMPP) 04-103 violates his constitutional rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United State Constitution. IMPP 04-103 provides for a savings account in which 10% of an inmate’s incoming monies less any outstanding obligations, and a specified portion of earnings from work release or private industry employment, is deposited and maintained…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Thornburgh v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Saucedo v. WingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ellibee v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Watson (ID 62184) v. SchnurrDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
  3. Watson (ID 62184) v. SchnurrDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API