Legal Opinion
Toney v. The Clorox Company
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided May 23, 2024No. 3:22-cv-05730Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 JEFFREY TONEY, CASE NO. C22-5730 BHS 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 THE CLOROX COMPANY, 11 Defendant. 12 13 This matter is before the Court on Jeffrey Toney’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 14 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment. Dkt. 62. Because Toney fails to establish an 15 entitlement to relief, the motion is denied. 16 Most of the facts relevant to this motion are set forth in the Court’s prior order 17 need not be repeated in full here. See Dkt. 55. In that order, the Court granted the Clorox 18…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carroll v. NakataniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Richard D. Peterson v. Hewlett-Packard Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Howard Turner Mary Turner Bill Oskowski Marisa Oskowski v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Marshall T. Stewart, Jr. And Isiah Williams v. William Henderson, Postmaster General and United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.