Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Smith

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 1993No. 90-KA-0821Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPlotkin, Judge

The gravamen of both defendants’ first assignment of error centers on an independent eyewitness’ account which was allegedly exculpatory to the defendants and which was not disclosed to the defendants prior to trial. Because I am of the opinion that the State should have disclosed the exculpatory material in its possession as to defendant Smith, I dissent from the majority’s opinion on that issue.

The witness in question is one Gregory Jones, the victim’s cousin. During separate pre-trial interviews with the state and defense counsel, Jones allegedly stated that he only saw Ryan Roberts shoot…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Tezino v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
  4. Wilkey v. Illinois Racing BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. People v. WedgeworthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API