Rouiller v. A. & B. Schuster Co.
District Court, D. Arizona
At Law. Action by A. E. Rouiller against the. A. & B. Schuster Company. On motion to strike, demurrers by complainant to defendant’s pleas in abatement, and demurrers by defendant to the complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
Motion to Strike.
SAWTELLE, District Judge.
Defendant has filed its motion to-strike the complaint from the files upon the ground that the attorney for plaintiff had not been admitted to practice in this court at the time he signed the complaint in the case at bar.
[1-3] It is admitted that plaintiff’s attorney is a member of the bar of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Supreme Court of this state, and that the defendant’s attorney has signed the certificate of the qualifications of plaintiff’s attorney, and there is no pretense that he is not a proper party. It was asserted by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wallace v. McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Hunt v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Rader v. SnyderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sutherland v. International Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Schifrin v. Chenille Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Conway v. State Consolidated Publishing Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1941
- Oregon Liquor Control Commission v. CoeOregon Supreme Court · 1940
- Stevens v. GertzDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.