Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided February 22, 2021No. 5:20-cv-00257Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA CYNTHIA K. STEPHENS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Cas e No. CIV-20-257-SM ANDREW M. SAUL, ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Cynthia K. Stephens (Plaintiff) brings this action for judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision that she was not “disabled” under the Social Security Act. See

42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 423(d)(1)(A). The parties have consented to the undersigned for proceedings consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). See…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Lax v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. Barnhart v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Wall v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  5. Langley v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API