Legal Opinion

People v. Marshall

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1969No. Docket No. 4,567PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

At defendant’s probation hearing held on August 21, 1967, probation was revoked and he was sentenced to prison.*

Counsel was not offered defendant at the hearing nor was counsel waived by him.

*579Since the ruling in Mempa v. Rhay (1967), 389 US 128 (88 S Ct 254, 19 L Ed 2d 336) a defendant must be afforded counsel at a hearing resulting in probation revocation and sentence. See McConnell v. Rhay (1968), 393 US 2 (89 S Ct 32, 21 L Ed 2d 2), People v. Lott (1968), 12 Mich App 123, People v. Hernandez (1968), 14 Mich App 741, and People v. Dye (1967), 6 Mich App 217.

Defendant’s sentence is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. McConnell v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. People v. DyeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. People v. HernandezMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. People v. LottMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. MarshallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API