People v. Marshall
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
At defendant’s probation hearing held on August 21, 1967, probation was revoked and he was sentenced to prison.*
Counsel was not offered defendant at the hearing nor was counsel waived by him.
*579Since the ruling in Mempa v. Rhay (1967), 389 US 128 (88 S Ct 254, 19 L Ed 2d 336) a defendant must be afforded counsel at a hearing resulting in probation revocation and sentence. See McConnell v. Rhay (1968), 393 US 2 (89 S Ct 32, 21 L Ed 2d 2), People v. Lott (1968), 12 Mich App 123, People v. Hernandez (1968), 14 Mich App 741, and People v. Dye (1967), 6 Mich App 217.
Defendant’s sentence is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McConnell v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- People v. DyeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- People v. HernandezMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- People v. LottMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. MarshallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969