Legal Opinion

Martin & Woolwine v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 30, 1898PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from the District Court of Garfield Coimty; before Jno. L. McAtee, District Judge. Action by Martin & Woolwine against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burwell, J.:

This.is an action for damages, brought by I. E. Martin and A. W. Woolwine, partners, doing business under the firm name and style of Martin & Woolwine, against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway company, for damages, for the refusal of the defendant to receive and ship certain cattle owned by plaintiffs, from South Enid, Oklahoma, to either Horton or. Caldwell, Kan., or to Medford, Oklahoma. On the trial, judgment was rendered for the defendant. Thereupon the plaintiffs appealed to this court.

The record discloses the fact that, at the time plaintiffs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. Comm'rs of Crawford CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  2. Morawetz v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Wilkes v. WolbackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  4. Thorp v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1891

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bleecker v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Rynhart v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Dunn v. Modern Foundry & MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Farmers' Product & Supply Co. v. BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Cherry Bros. Trading Co. v. Rock Island Implement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API