Legal Opinion
Monica Bury v. Marietta Dodge
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided February 28, 1983No. 82-8282PublishedCited by 22 opinions
Non-Argument Calendar.
1Per curiam
In this Truth in Lending Act case, we must determine what weight is to be given unofficial opinions of Federal Reserve Board staff members. Following precedent, we affirm the trial court’s ruling that controlling weight is not to be given to these unofficial opinions.
FACTS
Appellant, Monica Bury, entered into a consumer credit transaction with appellee, Marietta Dodge (Dodge), an automobile dealership. In August, 1980, Bury began a civil action against Dodge in the district court, alleging that her consumer contract with Dodge was violative of the Truth in Lending Act. She alleged that Dodge…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Anderson Bros. Ford v. ValenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Meadows & Walker Drilling Company v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Joy Ellen Smathers v. Fulton Federal Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Elijah & Shirley C. Whitfield, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross v. Termplan, Inc., Bolton, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Carl Harold MyersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Itel Capital Corporation, a Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Cups Coal Company, Incorporated, a Corporation and Herman Mulvehill, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. S. Sam CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. WeinsteinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Michael W. Nolin v. Douglas County, Earl D. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.