Legal Opinion

Lockhart v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 16, 1917No. 8331PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; George W. Clark, Judge- Action by F.-E. Anderson, M. D. Anderson, B. Clayton, and W. L. Clayton, partners doing business as Anderson, Clayton & Co., against George D. Lockhart, county weigher, an(l another. There was a judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

This action wa< instituted by Anderson, Clayton & Co., a firm to enjoin Geo. D. Lockhart, county weigher, and J. B. Goodnight, deputy county weigher, of Oklahoma county, from proceeding under authority apparently vested in them by an act of the Legislature of this state approved April 1, 1915, Session Laws. 1915, p. 379, upon the ground that the said act is unconstitutional. Hereinafter the parties will be referred to as they were in the trial court. The act reads:

“Section 1.. It shall be the duty of the county weigher of any county of the state of Oklahoma, where there…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. . HavnorNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. State v. LoomisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. State ex rel. Wyatt v. AshbrookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. People Ex Rel. Tyroler v. Warden of City PrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Taylor v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. GIBBY v. HOBBY LOBBY STORES INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  2. Gibby v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  3. Interstate Compress Co. v. ColleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API