David Marsico v. Sears Holding Corporatio
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff David Marsico appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant Sears Holding Corporation, formerly known as Kmart Holding Corporation, on his claims of discrimination, in violation of the Age Discrimination Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 622 et sec/., and the Michigan Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, M.C.L. §§ 37.2101 et seq. For the reasons that follow, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
A. Factual Background
David Marsico, who was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Ralph RohnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Barry Bartlett v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Rachells v. Cingular Wireless Employee Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- General Star Indemnity Company v. Louisville Area Governmental Self Insurance TrustDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2024
- General Star Indemnity Company v. Louisville Area Governmental Self Insurance Trust, et al.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.