Hall v. State

Ruffin, Chief Judge.

Following a bench trial, the court found Kasey Hall guilty of armed robbery.1 On appeal, Hall challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. Hall also contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his attorney did not seek to have the case transferred to the juvenile court. For reasons that follow, we find these enumerations of error lack merit and affirm.

1. “On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence must be construed in the light most favorable to the verdict, and the appellant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence.”2 Viewed in this…