Legal Opinion

State v. Cook

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1986No. 14522PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Chief Judge.

Following nonjury trial defendant was convicted of driving while intoxicated and fined $400. He appeals, presenting two contentions of trial error.

Defendant states in his first point that the trial court erred in allowing a witness to testify to statements made by defendant that he had been driving the vehicle because “the admission of the testimony violates the rule that when the corpus delicti has not been sufficiently proven, an uncorroborated extrajudicial confession of guilt cannot be regarded as evidence tending to show guilt.”

Unless there is some independent proof…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Spoeneman v. UhriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. State v. GarrettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. State v. BuffingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. State v. BrooksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Taylor v. McNeillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. HammonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. District of Columbia v. WhitleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API