Legal Opinion

State of Tennessee v. Janet Michelle Stanfield, Tony Alan Winsett and Justin Bradley Stanfield

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 2018No. W2015-02503-SC-R11-CDPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoger A. Page, J.

An Obion County grand jury indicted Tony Alan Winsett, Janet Michelle Stanfield, and Justin Bradley Stanfield for multiple drug and weapons charges based on the warrantless search of their home and the subsequent automobile stop involving defendants Winsett and Janet Stanfield.

The defendants filed motions to suppress the evidence against them based on an allegedly improper search. Following a suppression hearing, the trial court granted the defendants' motions and dismissed the charges against them. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court's ruling. The State then filed an…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Guy A. Cobb v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2026
  2. Kurt McElroy v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. LMV-AL Ventures, LLC v. Carol Hemphill, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2020
  4. State of Tennessee v. Angela Carrie Payton Hamm and David Lee HammTennessee Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State of Tennessee v. Angela Carrie Payton Hamm and David Lee Hamm - DissentingTennessee Supreme Court · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API