Pinal Creek Group v. Newmont Mining Corp.
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ANDERSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
This mátter arises on the Motion in Limine of Defendant Atlantic Richfield Company (“Atlantic Richfield” or “ARCO”), (document # 1573) Atlantic Richfield seeks to exclude Plaintiffs’ proffered expert testimony from the Phase One trial. Atlantic Richfield also renews its previously filed Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Legal Experts (document # 1014) which the Court denied, without prejudice, as premature during the discovery phase. Plaintiffs oppose the pending motion. As an initial matter, Plaintiffs assert that the motion is premature. After…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Specht v. JensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Marx & Co. v. Diners' Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- YANKEE GAS SERVICES CO. v. UGI Utilities, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- McDevitt v. GuentherDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2007
- Casper v. SMGDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Andrade v. American First Finance, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023
- BBK Tobacco & Foods LLP v. Central Coast Agriculture IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.