Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1992No. B065330PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS (Fred), J.

I

Introduction

In this petition for writ of mandate we are asked to decide whether rule 185.5 of the California Rules of Court requires the appellate department of *1186the superior court to conclusively presume a misdemeanor appellant is indigent for purposes of appointing appellate counsel if he was found indigent and represented by appointed counsel in the trial court. We find that rule 185.5 does not require such a conclusive presumption.

II

Facts and Proceedings Below

Petitioner Jorge Zavala Hernandez was tried in municipal court on a misdemeanor charge of receiving stolen…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Tripp v. SwoapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Landrum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Walling v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. DubonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. In Re ANNRHON, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Morris v. Superior Court of San Bernardino Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Sanders v. LesinskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Hernandez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API