Legal Opinion

Buchanan v. Davis

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 23, 1929No. Nos. 1145-5099PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.

The will of Ophelia Buchanan was attacked .for absence of testamentary capacity and presence (and procuring effect) of undue'influence. The jury sustained both charges, and the judgment nullifying the will was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 300 S. W. 985. Writ of error was allowed each of two groups of appellants upon petitions claiming error in matters hereinafter discussed.

1. Jurisdiction of the district court is lacking, it is said, because there was no final judgment of the county court in probate. Except for recitals immaterial here and one to be mentioned, the judgment of the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Henry v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Last Chance Mining Co. v. Tyler Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Brown v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Scott v. TownsendTexas Supreme Court · 1914

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lindley v. LindleyTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Turcotte v. TrevinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. City of Fort Worth v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Buchanan v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Trigg v. TriggNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API