Mach v. Baum
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, second district, in favor of defendants, after trial by the court without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtMullan, J.
The defendant Cash,' a city marshal, on March 7, 1916, seized the stock in trade of one Daniel Mach, the son of the plaintiff, upon levy under execution of a judgment obtained by the defendant Baum. The plaintiff claims that at the time of the levy she was the owner of the seized goods, by virtue of a bill of sale to her executed by the judgment debtor, Daniel Mach, on February 16,1916, and she brings this action *608. against both Baum and Cash for conversion. At the trial, and on the briefs, there was much discussion of fraud, but, although the sale seems ■ clearly to have been fraudulent, the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Wyman, Partridge & Co. v. TierneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
- Kirkholder & Rausch Co. v. BridglandNew York Supreme Court · 1923
- Thorndike & Hix Lobster Co. v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Becker v. Brooklyn Edison Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1923
- Levin v. BrumbergDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1942