Legal Opinion

Village of Oakwood v. Wuliger

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1982No. 81-106PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford F. Brown, J.

We limit our review to the issue of whether the Mayor’s Court had the power to punish appellee for contempt in this case.2

I

Appellee argues that the Mayor’s Court would not have been able to punish him for contempt under R. C. 1907.171, and, therefore, that the court could not hold him in contempt under village ordinance 525.14. See fn. 1, supra. We agree.

“It is a rule of law in Ohio that courts of limited jurisdiction, such as justices of the peace, have no inherent power to punish for contempt and have only such power to punish for contempt as is conferred by statute.” In re Shelton (1957),…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Matter of LandsOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Davis v. State Personnel Bd. of ReviewOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Truman v. WaltonOhio Supreme Court · 1899
  4. In Re SheltonOhio Court of Appeals · 1957

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Johnson v. County CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In Re PurolaOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. In Re DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Kuczak v. SaffoldOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. City of Strongsville v. WaiwoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API